Application of 20% silver nanoclusters in polymethacrylic acid on simulated dentin caries; its penetration depth and effect on surface hardness.

The aims of this study were: To evaluate the surface hardness of simulated dentin caries lesions treated with either silver nanoclusters (AgNCls) synthesized in polymethacrylic acid (PMAA) or 38% silver diammine fluoride (SDF), as well as observe the penetration of the treatment solutions into the simulated caries lesions. Dentin blocks 4 mm thick obtained from caries-free third molars were sectioned and then simulated caries lesions on the occlusal dentin surfaces were created. Each specimen (n = 8) was divided into four sections: (A) treated with 20% AgNCls/PMAA; (B) treated with SDF 38% (FAgamin, Tedequim, Cordoba, Argentina); (C) sound tooth protected by nail-varnish during artificial caries generation (positive control); and (D) artificial caries lesion without surface treatment (negative control). AgNCls/PMAA or SDF were applied on the simulated lesions with a microbrush for 10 s, then excess removed. The surface hardness was measured by means of Vickers indentation test. To trace the depth of penetration, up to 400 µm, of silver ions, elemental composition of the samples was observed using EDX, coupled with SEM, and measured every 50 µm from the surface towards the pulp chamber. Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) was also employed to trace silver ion penetration; the atomic silver line 328.06 nm was used with a 60 µm laser spot size to a depth of 240 µm. Student's-t test identified significant differences between treatment groups for each depth and the Bonferroni test was used for statistical analysis of all groups (p < 0.05). Mean surface hardness values obtained were 111.2 MPa, 72.3 MPa, 103.3 MPa and 50.5 MPa for groups A, B, C and D respectively. There was a significant difference between groups A and C compared with groups B and D, the group treated with AgNCls/PMAA achieved the highest surface hardness, similar or higher than the sound dentin control. A constant presence of silver was observed throughout the depth of the sample for group A, while group B showed a peak concentration of silver at the surface with a significant drop beyond 50 µm. The 20% AgNCls/PMAA solution applied to simulated dentin caries lesions achieved the recovery of surface hardness equivalent to sound dentin with the penetration of silver ions throughout the depth of the lesion.

Surface gloss, gloss retention, and color stability of 2 nano-filled universal resin composites.

Objectives: This study compared the surface gloss (SG), gloss retention (GR), and color stability (CS) of 2 universal resin composites after chemical (CA) and mechanical (MA) aging. Materials and Methods: Twenty disc-shaped samples of G-ænial A´Chord (GC-Europe) and Filtek Universal (3M-ESPE) were polished with sequential abrasive papers. For CA, specimens were stored in 1 mL of 75% ethanol for 15 days at 37°C, and readings (SG, GR, and CS) were obtained at baseline and 5, 10, and 15 days. For MA, specimens were subjected to 10,750 simulated brushing cycles. SG and CS were evaluated after every 3,583 cycles. SG was measured with a glossmeter (geometrical configuration: 60°), and values were expressed in gloss units. Color was measured with a spectrophotometer using the CIE-L*a*b* color system. The Student's t-test, 1-way analysis of variance, and Scheffé test were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Results: G-ænial presented significantly higher SG values than Filtek (p = 0.02), with GR reductions of 5.2% (CA) and 5.3% (MA) for G-ænial and 7.6% (CA) and 7.2% (MA) for Filtek. The aging protocol had no statistically significant effect on SG or GR (p = 0.25) from baseline to the final readings. G-ænial-MA presented the lowest color difference (∆E = 1.8), and G-ænial-CA and Filtek-CA had the largest changes (∆E = 8.6 and ∆E = 11.8, respectively). Conclusion: G-ænial presented higher SG values and better CS. Both restorative materials demonstrated acceptable GR and CS. Aging protocols impacted these properties negatively.

Color changes and shear bond strength to simulated caries lesions treated with a novel solution of 20% silver nanoclusters in polymethacrylic acid.

The aims of the study were: (1) To compare the staining effect on demineralized dentin simulating caries between silver nanoclusters (AgNCls) synthesized using polymethacrylic acid (PMAA) and silver diammine fluoride (SDF), and (2) to measure the shear bond strength (SBS) of a glass ionomer cement (GIC) to simulated caries lesions with and without the application of AgNCls/PMAA or SDF. Dentine blocks 4 mm thick from twenty-four non-carious third molars were sectioned and coated with nail varnish (Revlon, New York, USA). Simulated caries lesions on occlusal dentin surfaces were created (66 h in 0.05 M acetate buffer 2.2 mM calcium/phosphate pH 5.0). Specimens were divided into groups and treated with (n = 8): (A) 20% AgNCls/PMAA; (B) SDF 38% (Fagamin, Tedequim, Córdoba, Argentina); or (C) without treatment. AgNCls/PMAA or SDF were applied on the exposed surfaces with a microbrush for 10 s. Samples were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C at 100% relative humidity. Surface color was measured according to the CIE-L*a*b* system before and after demineralization (R0 and R1), 24 h and one week after treatment (R2 and R3), using a spectrophotometer (CM-600D Konica Minolta Sesing Inc., Japan). Groups A and B received an extra application of AgNCls/PMAA or SDF before a conventional GIC (Fuji IX-Gold Label, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan) was bonded using a mold, 4 mm diameter × 3 mm high. For SBS, a Universal Testing Machine (Digimess RS-8000-5, China)-crosshead speed of 1 mm/min-was used. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, Student-t and Scheffe-test at a significance of p < 0.05. Group A presented a stable color p = 0.24 between R1-R2 and R1-R3 in contrast to significant color changes in Group B (p = 0.02). SBS was higher (p < 0.01) in Group A (10.4 ± 2.7 MPa) compared to Groups B (3.3 ± 1.3 MPa) and C (4.0 ± 0.4 MPa), where no differences between the latter groups were observed (p = 0.77). Results of this preliminary study demonstrated that 20% AgNCls/PMAA did not stain simulated carious dentin and improved SBS of the GIC. The relevance of this study relies on the development of a therapeutic system to potentially arrest caries lesions without staining.

Nonrestorative Caries Treatment: A Systematic Review Update.

Caries is the most prevalent chronic noncommunicable disease. Strategies to prevent its onset and early interventions to arrest the progression of early lesions have been emphasised throughout recent decades to avoid or delay the restorative spiral of the tooth. More individuals are retaining their natural teeth into old age, thereby necessitating ongoing restorative dentistry intervention for their maintenance. The aim of this systematic review was to update the state of the art regarding clinical studies reporting the effectiveness of different nonrestorative caries treatment options in the 5-year period from 2017 to 2022. Relevant articles were retrieved from 2 electronic databases, including randomised clinical trials (RCTs) published from January 2017 until April 2022, assessing effectiveness and secondary effects of at least one nonrestorative caries treatment option, carried out with adults and/or children with noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions on either primary or permanent teeth and diagnosed by radiographs or visual/tactile assessment. All 35 included articles presented the results of RCTs with a follow-up period ranging from 6 to 84 months. Most of these studies were considered high-quality articles with a low risk of bias. Sealants and fluoride gels and varnishes were mentioned in 12 studies as effective strategies to prevent the onset of caries lesions and to arrest them in the early stages. Resin infiltration reported high caries arresting rates in noncavitated proximal lesions in 10 publications. Silver diammine fluoride presented high caries-arresting rates in open dentin lesions, both in primary and permanent dentitions as well as in root caries lesions that were accessible for cleansing. New evidence has been published between 2017 and 2022 as the result of numerous clinical studies providing further evidence of the effectiveness of nonrestorative caries treatment options.

Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to present the results of a consensus meeting on the threshold property requirements for the clinical use of conventional glass-ionomer cements (GICs) for restorative indications. METHODS: Twenty-one experts on GICs evaluated the results of tests on mechanical and optical properties of 18 different brands of restorative GICs: Bioglass R [B], Chemfil Rock [CR], Equia Forte [EF], Gold Label 2 [GL2], Gold Label 9 [GL9], Glass Ionomer Cement II [GI], Ionglass [IG], Ion Z [IZ], Ionomaster [IM], Ionofil Plus [IP], Ionostar Plus [IS], Ketac Molar Easymix [KM], Magic Glass [MG], Maxxion R [MA], Riva Self Cure [R], Vidrion R [V], Vitro Fil [VF] and Vitro Molar [VM]. All experiments were carried out by a team of researchers from Brazil and England following strict protocols, under the same laboratory conditions throughout, and maintaining data integrity. RESULTS: There was consensus on: determining as primary properties of the material: compressive strength, microhardness, acid erosion and fluoride release, and as secondary properties: contrast ratio and translucency parameter, in order to rank the materials. Seven brands were below the thresholds for restorative indications: IZ, IM, IG, MA, VF, B and MG. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the primary properties adopted as being essential for restorative indications, the conventional restorative GICs that met the thresholds and could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials were: EF, GI, GL9, KM, IP, GL2, IS, CR, V, VM and R. A decision-making process to select the best GIC must also include results from clinical trials. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides a ranking of GICs that could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials based on their main properties.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Class II ART High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Cement and Conventional Resin-composite restorations in Permanent Dentition: Two-year Survival.

Purpose: To compare the 2-year cumulative survival rates of class II restorations made according to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) with axial grooves and the high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) Equia Fil (GC) and the conventional method using the resin composite Filtek Z250 (3M Oral Care). Materials and Methods: A parallel-group study design and a stratified randomization process (DMFS count and cavity size) were applied. Restorations were evaluated according to the ART restoration and USPHS criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using the proportional hazard rate regression model with frailty correction. Results: 272 class II restorations were placed in 131 people (mean age 26.2 years) by two dentists. The dropout rate of restorations was 2.6%. According to ART restoration and USPHS criteria, the 2-year cumulative survival rates of class II ART/HVGIC restorations were 96.2% and 97.0%, respectively, and 97.8% and 98.5%, respectively, for the conventional class II resin-composite restorations. No differences were observed in the cumulative survival rates between the two treatment groups at 2 years (ART criteria: p=0.26; USPHS criteria p=0.23). Conclusion: HVGIC Equia Fil used in the ART method with axial grooves and Filtek Z250 in the conventional method provided high survival rates for restoring class II cavities over 2 years.

High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial.

The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the 5-year cumulative survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations using high-viscosity glass-ionomer restorations (ART/HVGIC) and conventional resin composite restorations (CRT) placed in patients with intellectual and/or physical disability. Patients referred for restorative care to a special care service in Córdoba, Argentina, were recruited. Patients and/or caregivers were provided with written and verbal information regarding treatment options and selected the alternative they preferred. The treatment protocols were ART (hand instruments/HVGIC) in the clinic or CRT (rotary instrumentation/resin composite) in the clinic or under general anaesthesia (GA). Two independent, trained and calibrated examiners evaluated restoration survival using established ART codes after 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months. The proportional hazard model with frailty corrections provided survival estimates. Jackknife errors were used to test 5-year results. Sixty-six patients (13.6 ± 7.8 years) with 16 different medical conditions participated. CRT in the clinic proved feasible for five patients (13%), and 14 patients received CRT under GA (21%). ART was provided for 47 patients (71.2%). A total number of 298 dentine carious lesions were restored in primary and permanent teeth (182 ART; 116 CRT). Four patients died between the 3 and 5-year follow up. Percentage survival and jackknife standard error were calculated and were significantly higher for all ART/HVGIC restorations (90.2% ± 2.6) than for all CRT restorations (82.8% ± 5.3), 5 years after placement (p=0.044). These 5-year follow-up results confirm that ART/HVGIC is an effective treatment protocol for patients with disability, equal to that of conventional resin composite restoration. The results of this clinical trial support the use of ART as an evidence-based treatment resource contributing to the reduction of inequalities in access to oral health care among people with disability.

Infiltración versus remineralización: estudio preliminar ex-vivo de alternativas para el tratamiento no invasivo de lesiones por caries con materiales bioactivos / Caries infiltration versus remineralization: a preliminary exvivo study of non-invasive alternative treatments using bioactive materials

El objetivo fue determinar profundidad de penetración en dentina cariada artificial y cambios en su dureza superficial de dos protocolos de tratamiento: 1- infiltración del tejido cariado con resina fluida modificada con nanopartículas de óxido de cinc y 2- remineralización con fluoruro di-amino de plata. Para tal fin se prepararon láminas de terceros molares sanos de 4 mm de espesor en los cuales se generaron lesiones artificiales de caries sobre la superficie oclusal de la muestra, en un área de 6x6 mm. Las muestras se dividieron en dos grupos de tratamiento. Cada muestra fue seccionada en tres porciones de superficie cariada y una sección adicional de dentina intacta. En dos de las secciones con caries se aplicó el protocolo de tratamiento correspondiente. De esas dos secciones, una fue utilizada para realizar un mapeo en microscopio electrónico de barrido (MEB), identificando la presencia de plata (Ag) o cinc (Zn). En la porción restante que recibió tratamiento se evaluó su dureza superficial y se la comparó con la parte que no recibió tratamiento y con la sección adicional de dentina intacta. La dureza superficial se valoró mediante diagramas de fuerza obtenidos por un microscopio de fuerza atómica (AFM). Los resultados evidenciaron una penetración significativa de Ag y presencia superficial de Zn en las muestras. Los diagramas de fuerza mostraron los valores más elevados en las superficies tratadas con Fluoruro de plata, seguidas por la dentina intacta y las superficies que recibieron la resina con nanopartículas de cinc. La dentina cariada presentó valores asociados a menor dureza. Se concluyó que ambos tratamientos pueden mejorar las propiedades mecánicas superficiales del tejido, pero se necesitan estudios más específicos para determinar la profundidad de penetración en dentina afectada por caries. (AU)

The aim was to determine the penetration depth into caries-affected dentin and the surface hardness of two treatment protocols: 1- caries infiltration using fluid resin modified by nanosized cinc particles and 2- remineralization by means of topical diamine silver fluoride. For that purpose, 6x6 mm artificial caries lesions were produced in occlusal surfaces of 4 mm-thick slices obtained from sane third molars. Tooth samples were divided into the two treatment groups. Each sample was split into three caries-affected sections and one non-affected additional portion. Treatment protocols were applied in two of these caries affected sections, sending one of them for mapping of silver (Ag) or cinc (Zn) on a scanning electron microscope. Surface hardness was assessed in the other treated section and compared to the results. (AU)

Nanotecnología aplicada a la optimización de cementos de ionómero vítreo para restauración: Presentación y discusión de un caso / Nanotechnology applied to optimize Restorative Glass Ionomer Cements: Discussion of one case

La decisión de eliminar la amalgama dental como material de restauración por parte de asociaciones odontológicas de referencia internacional ha motivado la creación de una agenda de investigación y desarrollo para encontrar el sustituto más adecuado. En este marco, los cementos de ionómero vítreo se posicionan como uno de los materiales con mejores características para cumplir la función de restauración. El aporte de la nanotecnología ha colaborado para mejorar propiedades ópticas y mecánicas de este grupo de materiales. Se presenta el seguimiento clínico por 6 años luego del reemplazo de cavidades oclusales simples de amalgama por cementos de ionómero vítreo de alta viscosidad en molares permanentes inferiores, con resultados aceptables según dos criterios de evaluación. (AU)

Decision of phasing out amalgam by referential international dental associations has motivated the creation of a research and development agenda in order to find out the best substitute for this metal alloy. In this scenario, glass ionomer cements are suggested as one of the most suitable restorative materials for this task. Nanotechnology has contributed to improve their optical and mechanical properties. The present article discusses a case that had been followed up for 6 years after old amalgams of occlusal cavities were replaced by a restorative high viscosity glass ionomer cement with an acceptable performance according to two assessment criteria. (AU)

Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático: atualidades e perspectivas / Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: advances and perspectives

O Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) atualmente é entendido como uma abordagem minimamente invasiva que compreende medidas preventivas, terapêuticas e restauradoras em relação à cárie dental e no controle dessa doença, inclusive no atendimento à pacientes especiais. O tratamento é feito apenas com a utilização de instrumentos manuais e com o uso do cimento de ionômero de vidro (CIV), aplicado para o selamento de cicatrículas e fissuras em risco de cárie e na restauração de dentes com cavidades nas quais as fissuras adjacentes também são seladas. As razões mais frequentes para as falhas das restaurações ART estão associadas ao deslocamento do ionômero de vidro em função de insuficiente remoção de esmalte desmineralizado e dentina decomposta; manipulação inadequada do pó/líquido do ionômero de vidro; grau de umidade e temperatura da mistura do ionômero no momento da manipulação; não preenchimento completo da cavidade com o material restaurador; contaminação por saliva e/ou sangue; limpeza ou condicionamento insuficiente das cavidades; grau de cooperação do paciente; habilidade do operador. Materiais com propriedades estéticas melhoradas têm surgido no mercado odontológico e devem servir de estímulo para a realização de trabalhos de ART nos dentes anteriores. No preparo do dente para as restaurações de ART de Classe II, é recomendável confeccionar retenções adicionais nas paredes vestibular e lingual para evitar o deslocamento da restauração. O ART é capaz de diminuir o nível de ansiedade e medo dos pacientes quando o operador não é um especialista, além de ser um tratamento que proporciona menor dor e desconforto, podendo ser realizado num consultório odontológico ou fora dele. Sugestões para novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o ART são propostas.

The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (A R T) is understood as a minimally invasive approach comprising preventive, therapeutic and restorative measures in relation to dental caries and in the control of this disease, including in attendance to patients of special needs. The treatment is done only with the use of hand instruments and with the use of glass ionomer cement (GIC), applied to the sealing of pits and fissures in caries risk and in the restoration of teeth with cavities in which the adjacent pits and fissures are also sealed. The most frequent reasons for the failures of ART restorations are the displacement of the glass ionomer due to inadequate removal of demineralized enamel and dentin decomposed; improper handling of the glass ionomer powder and liquid; degree of humidity and temperature of the mix GIC at the time of handling; not full fill of the cavity with the restorative material; contamination by saliva and/or blood; cleaning or conditioning of cavities; degree of cooperation of the patient; skill of the operator. Materials with improved aesthetic properties have emerged on the market and must serve as a stimulus for the works of ART in the anterior teeth. In the preparation of the tooth for class II ART restorations, we recommend that you make additional retentions in the vestibular and lingual walls to prevent the displacement of the restoration. The ART is able to reduce the level of anxiety and fear of patients when the operator is not an expert, and is a treatment that provides less pain and discomfort, and can be performed in a dental office or out of it. Suggestions for new research agendas on the ART are proposed.

Acceptability, feasibility and perceived satisfaction of the use of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment approach for people with disability.

Unmet caries treatment need is prevalent among people with disability, partly due to difficulties cooperating with conventional dental treatment. This study compared Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) with conventional restorative treatment (CRT) in the clinic and under general anaesthesia (GA), in terms of feasibility, acceptability and respondent satisfaction in patients referred for special care dentistry. Patients referred for dental restorative care were treated using either ART or CRT approach. Acceptance, feasibility and level of satisfaction with the treatment provided were assessed. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and Chi-square tests investigated differences in age, gender and Visual Analogue Scale satisfaction scores. A total of 66 patients (mean 13.6 ± 7.8 years) were included and 43 respondents chose ART. ART was feasible for 47 patients, with optimal placement of restorations for 79% of all patients receiving ART. CRT in the clinic was chosen by 15 respondents and was feasible for 5 (33%). Local anaesthesia was required for 4 of the 47 patients receiving ART and for 3 of the 5 patients receiving CRT in the clinic. Neither ART nor CRT could be performed in the clinic for 14 patients who were treated under GA (21%). Respondent satisfaction was higher for those receiving ART than CRT (in the clinic and under GA). It was concluded that ART is a satisfactory, feasible, acceptable and effective approach to restorative dental treatment in patients with disability who have difficulty coping with conventional treatment. More research is now required to confirm these results in a larger study population.

Acceptability, feasibility and perceived satisfaction of the use of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment approach for people with disability

Unmet caries treatment need is prevalent among people with disability, partly due to difficulties cooperating with conventional dental treatment. This study compared Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) with conventional restorative treatment (CRT) in the clinic and under general anaesthesia (GA), in terms of feasibility, acceptability and respondent satisfaction in patients referred for special care dentistry. Patients referred for dental restorative care were treated using either ART or CRT approach. Acceptance, feasibility and level of satisfaction with the treatment provided were assessed. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and Chi-square tests investigated differences in age, gender and Visual Analogue Scale satisfaction scores. A total of 66 patients (mean 13.6 ± 7.8 years) were included and 43 respondents chose ART. ART was feasible for 47 patients, with optimal placement of restorations for 79% of all patients receiving ART. CRT in the clinic was chosen by 15 respondents and was feasible for 5 (33%). Local anaesthesia was required for 4 of the 47 patients receiving ART and for 3 of the 5 patients receiving CRT in the clinic. Neither ART nor CRT could be performed in the clinic for 14 patients who were treated under GA (21%). Respondent satisfaction was higher for those receiving ART than CRT (in the clinic and under GA). It was concluded that ART is a satisfactory, feasible, acceptable and effective approach to restorative dental treatment in patients with disability who have difficulty coping with conventional treatment. More research is now required to confirm these results in a larger study population.

Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART).

UNLABELLED: The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach was suggested to be a suitable method to treat enamel and dentine carious lesions in patients with disabilities. The use of a restorative glass-ionomer with optimal mechanical properties is, therefore, very important. OBJECTIVE: To test the null-hypotheses that no difference in diametral tensile, compressive and flexural strengths exists between: (1) The EQUIA system and (2) The Chemfil Rock (encapsulated glass-ionomers; test materials) and the Fuji 9 Gold Label and the Ketac Molar Easymix (hand-mixed conventional glass-ionomers; control materials); (3) The EQUIA system and Chemfil Rock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens for testing flexural (n = 240) and diametral tensile (n=80) strengths were prepared according to standardized specifications; the compressive strength (n=80) was measured using a tooth-model of a class II ART restoration. ANOVA and Tukey B tests were used to test for significant differences between dependent and independent variables. RESULTS: The EQUIA system and Chemfil Rock had significantly higher mean scores for all the three strength variables than the Fuji 9 Gold Label and Ketac Molar Easymix (α=0.05). The EQUIA system had significant higher mean scores for diametral tensile and flexural strengths than the Chemfil Rock (α=0.05). CONCLUSION: The two encapsulated high-viscosity glass-ionomers had significantly higher test values for diametral tensile, flexural and compressive strengths than the commonly used hand-mixed high-viscosity glass-ionomers.

Mechanical performance of encapsulated restorative glass-ionomer cements for use with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)

The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach was suggested to be a suitable method to treat enamel and dentine carious lesions in patients with disabilities. The use of a restorative glass-ionomer with optimal mechanical properties is, therefore, very important. Objective To test the null-hypotheses that no difference in diametral tensile, compressive and flexural strengths exists between: (1) The EQUIA system and (2) The Chemfil Rock (encapsulated glass-ionomers; test materials) and the Fuji 9 Gold Label and the Ketac Molar Easymix (hand-mixed conventional glass-ionomers; control materials); (3) The EQUIA system and Chemfil Rock. Material and Methods Specimens for testing flexural (n = 240) and diametral tensile (n=80) strengths were prepared according to standardized specifications; the compressive strength (n=80) was measured using a tooth-model of a class II ART restoration. ANOVA and Tukey B tests were used to test for significant differences between dependent and independent variables. Results The EQUIA system and Chemfil Rock had significantly higher mean scores for all the three strength variables than the Fuji 9 Gold Label and Ketac Molar Easymix (α=0.05). The EQUIA system had significant higher mean scores for diametral tensile and flexural strengths than the Chemfil Rock (α=0.05). Conclusion The two encapsulated high-viscosity glass-ionomers had significantly higher test values for diametral tensile, flexural and compressive strengths than the commonly used hand-mixed high-viscosity glass-ionomers. .

The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed.

The success of ART as a caries management approach is supported by more than 20 years of scientific evidence. ART follows the contemporary concepts of modern cariology and restorative dentistry. It challenges treatment concepts such as step-wise excavation and the need for complete removal of affected dentine. The ART approach so far has mainly used high-viscosity glass-ionomer as the sealant and restorative material. Cariostatic and remineralization properties have been ascribed to this material which requires further research to establish its clinical relevance. The adhesion of high-viscosity glass-ionomer to enamel in pits and fissures is apparently strong, as its remnants, blocking the pits and fissures, have been considered a possible reason for the low prevalence of carious lesion development after the glass-ionomer has clinically disappeared from it. Encapsulated high-viscosity glass-ionomers may lead to higher restoration survival results than those of the hand-mixed version and should, therefore, not be neglected when using ART. Similarly, the use of resin-modified glass-ionomer with ART should be researched. The effectiveness of ART when compared to conventional caries management approaches has been shown in numerous studies. Proper case selection is an important factor for long-lasting ART restoration survival. This is based on the caries risk situation of the individual, the size of the cavity opening, the strategic position of the cavitated tooth and the presence of adequate caries control measures. As the operator is one of the main causes for failure of ART restorations, attending a well-conducted ART training course is mandatory for successful implementation of ART.

The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed

The success of ART as a caries management approach is supported by more than 20 years of scientific evidence. ART follows the contemporary concepts of modern cariology and restorative dentistry. It challenges treatment concepts such as step-wise excavation and the need for complete removal of affected dentine. The ART approach so far has mainly used high-viscosity glass-ionomer as the sealant and restorative material. Cariostatic and remineralization properties have been ascribed to this material which requires further research to establish its clinical relevance. The adhesion of high-viscosity glass-ionomer to enamel in pits and fissures is apparently strong, as its remnants, blocking the pits and fissures, have been considered a possible reason for the low prevalence of carious lesion development after the glass-ionomer has clinically disappeared from it. Encapsulated high-viscosity glass-ionomers may lead to higher restoration survival results than those of the hand-mixed version and should, therefore, not be neglected when using ART. Similarly, the use of resin-modified glass-ionomer with ART should be researched. The effectiveness of ART when compared to conventional caries management approaches has been shown in numerous studies. Proper case selection is an important factor for long-lasting ART restoration survival. This is based on the caries risk situation of the individual, the size of the cavity opening, the strategic position of the cavitated tooth and the presence of adequate caries control measures. As the operator is one of the main causes for failure of ART restorations, attending a well-conducted ART training course is mandatory for successful implementation of ART.